After the success of The September Issue, it seems Vogue can’t get enough of opening their doors to the outside world.
‘In Vogue: The Editor’s Eye’ premieres on December 6th in the U.S and follows the mag’s fashion editors around the Conde Nast offices as well as on location.
Vogue describes the HBO film as: ‘highlighting the visual and historical contribution editors past and present (including Polly Allen Mellen, Grace Coddington, and Camilla Nickerson) have made not only to the magazine, but also to the world of fashion itself.’
After over twenty years of super-modelling, Carla Bruni-Sarkozy has learnt a thing or two about Vogue covers.
But not even a pose to rival Zoolander’s Blue Steel can smooth out her skin to that extent.
The 44-year-old clearly enlisted the help of miracle product Photoshop to get the ‘I’m still 35′ look for the December issue.
She still looks fab though. Must be that anti-feminist approach to life.
In the accompanying interview, Carla said: ‘There are pioneers who opened the breach. I’m not at all an active feminist. On the contrary, I’m a bourgeois. I love family life, I love doing the same thing every day.’
She also revealed the inevitable truth none of us want to face up to: ’I’ve ended up becoming my mother in some respects, despite my eight years of therapy.’
Gisele is the super-dupermodel who had a baby and minutes later took part in an ‘at home’ with Vogue where she struck an unfeasible yoga pose looking a) like she’d never had more than a large lunch in her belly, rather than a creature the size of a pumpkin, and b) like an ethereal creature whose coltish limbs are twice as long as ours (life is so unfair).
Gisele sans baby bump
She enraged regular Joannas when she said she didn’t need pain relief for her perfect birth – she simply meditated. It didn’t even hurt! So it’s no surprise that the BRazilian super has gone back for more, if rumours are to believed. Vogue think she is pregnant (so unlike them to perpetuate a rumour unless it’s true!) – check out the picture here: vogue.co.uk as do Us Weekly, who have posted lots more pics here: Us Weekly.
You reckon a baby will REALLY fit in there?
Adding to their wild speculation is a quote given by an unconfirmed source to UsWeekly: ‘Yes, she is pregnant,’ the source blurted out inapproriately. ‘They are really happy,’ indiscreet pal added, telling the mag that Bundchen is “three months” along.
Bundchen told Vogue in December 2011 that she wanted ‘more kids for sure, but I don’t know when,’ adding that she had her ‘hands full’ with her then-almost-two-year-old son Benjamin and her stepson Jack.
What do you think? Pregnant, or just wearing a loose T-shirt? And if you go for the latter, be prepared for people to ask if you’re pregnant next time you wear your gym kit.